Preview

Filin’s Clinical endoscopy

Advanced search

First results of using percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): indications, technique, complications and results

https://doi.org/10.31146/2415-7813-endo-65-4-40-44

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (CEG) is the gold standard when it is necessary to carry out long-term (more than four weeks) enteral probe feeding or decompression of the stomach Materials and methods: During the period from 2012 to 2021, CHEG was performed in 47 patients. There were 29 men (62%) and 18 women (38%) in the study group, the average age was 74 years. The indications, contraindications, the method of setting the ECG, complications are described and analyzed. Results and discussion: During the observation, no unsuccessful attempts to install the CEG were registered. The duration of the CHEG was from 3 to 18 months. In total, 3 complications were noted - this was 6.3%, which is comparable to the literature data, where, according to various sources, the complication rate ranges from 3.7 to 35%. Conclusions: Endoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy is an affordable minimally invasive method, low-traumatic, technically simple and short-term intervention, accompanied by minimal postoperative complications. CHEG creates opportunities for an earlier start of nutrition and does not require repeated surgery to close the gastrostomy, which determines its advantages over traditional surgical access methods for enteral nutrition.

About the Authors

E. V. Potekhina
United Hospital with polyclinic of the UD of the President of the Russian Federation; Central StateMedical Academy of the UD of the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


O. Yu. Vasilenko
United Hospital with polyclinic of the UD of the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


Z. N. Golikova
Central StateMedical Academy of the UD of the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Балалыкин А. С., Козин С. М., Саввин В. Ю. и др. Чрескожная эндоскопическая гастростомия. Эндоскоп. хир. 2007. No 1. - С. 115-116.

2. Волков О. И. Чрескожная эндоскопическая гастростомия. Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал. г. Владивосток, 2004. No 1. с. 30-35.

3. Belevich V.L., Strukov E.Ju., Brednev A.O., Ovchinnikov D.V. Chreskozhnaja jendoskopicheskaja gastrostomija - metod vybora dlja dlitel’nogo jenteral’nogo pitanija. Novosti hirurgii. 2014; 22(6): 750-4. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chreskozhnaya-endoskopicheskaya-gastrostomiya-metod-vybora-dlya-dlitelnogo-enteralnogo-pitaniya.

4. Deitch E.A., Winterton J., Li M., Berg R. The gut as a portal of entry for bacteremia. Role of protein malnutrition. Ann Surg. 1987;205:681-692.

5. Samigullin M.F., Bilalov I.V., Duglav E.A., Kosolapova T.V., Kunduhova F.T., Habibulina A.R. Chreskozhnaja jendoskopicheskaja mikrogastrostomija kak metod dlitel’nogo jenteral’nogo i lechebno-terapevticheskogo obespechenija pacientov. Kazanskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2017; 98(4): 645-9. Available from: https://journals.eco-vector.com/kazanmedj/article/download/6891/5530. [In Russian].DOI: 10.17750/KMJ2017-645

6. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, Kurtz A, Farkas DT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28; 20(24):7739-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7739.

7. Gomes C.A. Jr, Andriolo R.B., Bennett C., Lustosa S.A., Matos D., Waisberg D.R., Waisberg J. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 22;(5): CD008096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008096.pub4.

8. Blomberg J., Lagergren J., Martin L., Mattsson F., Lagergren P. Complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;47(6):737-42. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.654404.

9. Rimon E., Kagansky N., Levy S. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; evidence of different prognosis in various patient subgroups. Age Ageing. 2005 Jul;34(4):353-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi085

10. Bannerman E., Pendlebury J., Phillips F., Ghosh S. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after percutaneous gastrostomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12(10):1101-9.

11. Gauderer M. W., Ponsky J. L., Izant R. J. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: A percutaneous endoscopic technique. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1980; 15 (6): 872-875. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(80)80296-X.

12. Grant J. P. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with Stamm gastrostomy. Ann. Surg. 1988 May;207(5):598-603.


Review

For citations:


Potekhina E.V., Vasilenko O.Yu., Golikova Z.N. First results of using percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): indications, technique, complications and results. Filin’s Clinical endoscopy. 2023;65(4):40-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/2415-7813-endo-65-4-40-44

Views: 62


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2415-7813 (Print)