Обучение, методика и осложнения эндоскопической сонографии (EUS) - руководство в гастроэнтерологии: технические рекомендации Европейского общества гастроэнтерологической эндоскопии (ESGE)

1. Dumonceau J.M, Polkowski M, Larghi A et al. Indications, results and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 897-912.

2. Dumonceau J.M, Riphaus A, Aparicio JR et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Guideline: Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol forGI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 960-974.

3. Dumonceau J.M, Andriulli A, Deviere J et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 503-515.

4. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001; 323: 334-336.

5. Chang K.J. EUS-guided FNA: the training is moving. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 69-73.

6. Barthet M, Gasmi M, Boustiere С et al. EUS training in a live pig model: does it improve echo endoscope hands-on and trainee competence? Endoscopy 2007; 39: 535-539.

7. Rosch T. State of the art lecture: endoscopic ultrasonography: training and competence. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 69-72.

8. Savides T.J, Fisher A.H, Gress FG et al. 1999 ASGE endoscopic ultrasound survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 745-750.

9. Wasan S.M, Kapadia A.S, Adler D.G. EUS training and practice patterns among gastroenterologists completing training since 1993. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 914-920.

10. Ho K.Y. Survey of endoscopic ultrasonographic practice and training in the Asia-Pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 1231-1235.

11. Das A, MouradW, Lightdale CJ et al. An international survey of the clinical practice of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 765-770.

12. Maffei M, Dumortier J, Dumonceau JM. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:410-418.

13. Eloubeidi M.A, Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 700-708.

14. Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 33-37.

15. Harewood G.C, Wiersema L.M, Hailing A.C et al. Influence of EUS training and pathology interpretation on accuracy of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 669-673.

16. Eisen G.M, Dominitz J.A, Faigel DO etal.Guidelines forcredentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:811-814.

17. Sorbi D, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ. A simple phantom for learning EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 580583.

18. Matsuda K, Tajiri H, Hawes R.H. How shall we experience EUS and EUSFNA before the first procedure? The development of learning tools. Dig Endosc 2004; 16: 236-239.

19. Bussen D, Sailer M, Fuchs KH et al. A teaching model for endorectal ultrasound-guided biopsy and drainage of pararectal tumors. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 217-219.

20. Bhutani M.S, Aveyard M, Stills H.F. Improved model for teaching interventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 400-403.

21. Klapman J.B, Logrono R, Dye CE et al. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1289-1294.

22. LeBlanc J.K, Emerson R.E, Dewitt J et al. A prospective study comparing rapid assessment of smears and ThinPrep for endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspirates. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 389394.

23. Sarker S.K, Albrani T, Zaman A et al. Procedural performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy: live and simulated. World J Surg 2010; 34:1764-1770.

24. Vilmann P, Saftoiu A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: equipment and technique. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 1646-1655.

25. Wiersema M.J, Levy M.J, Harewood G.C et al. Initial experience with EUSguided trucut needle biopsies of perigastric organs. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56: 275-278.

26. Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N et al.Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 397-401.

27. Siddiqui U.D, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1093-1097.

28. Song T.J, Kim J.H, Lee S.S et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1739- 1745.

29. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 24: 384-390.

30. Yusuf ТЕ, Ho S, Pavey DA et al. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 445-448.

31. Itoi T, Itokawa F, Kurihara T et al. Experimental endoscopy: objective evaluation of EUS needles. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 509-516.

32. Bhutani M.S, Suryaprasad S, Moezzi J et al. Improved technique for performing endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 550-553.

33. Wallace M.B, Kennedy T, Durkalski V et al. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 441447.

34. Puri R, Vilmann P, Saftoiu A et al. Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 499-504.

35. Larghi A, Noffsinger A, Dye С et al. EUS-guided fine needle tissue acquisition by using high negative pressure suction for the evaluation of solid masses: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 768774.

36. Rastogi A, Wani S, Gupta N et al. A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 58-64.

37. Wani S, Gupta N, Gaddam S et al. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 2409-2414.

38. Sahai A.V, Paquin S.C, Gariepy G. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 900-903.

39. Dumonceau JM. Should we discard the needle stylet during EUS-FNA? Endoscopy 2011; 43: 167.

40. Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Gincoul R et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 564-570.

41. Giovannini M, Thomas B, Erwan В et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study.World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1587-1593.

42. Rogart J.N, Loren D.E, Singu B.S et al. Cyst wall puncture and aspiration during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration may increase the diagnostic yield of mucinous cysts of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 164-169.

43. Al-Haddad M, Gill KR, Raimondo M et al. Safety and efficacy of cytology brushings versus standard fine-needle aspiration in evaluating cystic pancreatic lesions: a controlled study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 127-132.

44. Thomas T, Bebb J, Mannath J et al. EUS-guided pancreatic cyst brushing: a comparative study in a tertiary referral centre. JOP 2010; 11: 163-169.

45. Sendino O, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Sole M et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided brushing increases cellular diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: A prospective study. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42: 877881.

46. Al-Haddad M, RaimondoM.Woodward T et al. Safety and efficacy of cytology brushings versus standard FNA in evaluating cystic lesions of the pancreas: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 894898.

47. Nguyen Y.P, Maple J.T, Zhang Q et al. Reliability of gross visual assessment of specimen adequacy during EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1264-1270.

48. Kocjan G, Chandra A, Cross P et al. BSCC Code of Practice - fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology 2009; 20: 283-296.

49. Nasuti J.F, Gupta P.K, Baloch Z.W. Diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: review of 5,688 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27: 1-4.

50. Woon C, Bardales R.H, Stanley M Wet al. Rapid assessment of fine needle aspiration and the final diagnosis - how often and why the diagnoses are changed. Cytojournal 2006; 3: 25.

51. Chang K.J, Katz K.D, Durbin Т.Е et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40; 694699.

52. Erickson R.A, Sayage-Rabie L, BeissnerRS. Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 184-190

53. Savides T.J, Donohue M, Hunt G et al. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 277-282.

54. Eloubeidi M.A, Jhala D, Chhieng D.C et al. Yield of endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 99: 285-292.

55. Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 243-250.

56. Jhala NC, Jhala D, Eltoum I et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration biopsy: a powerful tool to obtain samples fromsmall lesions. Cancer 2004; 102: 239-246.

57. Williams D.B, Sahai A.V, Aabakken L et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience Gut 1999;44:720-726.

58. Eloubeidi M.A, Tamhane A, Jhala N et al. Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: implications for the endosonographer and patient management. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2841-2847.

59. Wiersema M.J, Vilmann P, Giovannini M et al. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1087-1095.

60. Cleveland P, Gill KRS, Coe SG et al. An evaluation of risk factors for inadequate cytology in EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tumors and lymph nodes. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1194-1199.

61. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106:1705-1710.

62. Cherian PT, Mohan P, Douiri A et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: is onsite cytopathology necessary? HPB (Oxford) 2010; 12: 389-395.

63. Moller K, Papanikolaou IS, Toermer T et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: high yield of 2 passes with combined histologic-cytologic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 60-69

64. Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros SN et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study. Cytopathology 2006; 17: 27-33.

65. Pellis6 Urquiza M, Ferndndez-Esparrach G, Sole M et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: predictive factors of accurate diagnosis and cost-minimization analysis of onsite pathologist. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 30: 319-324.

66. Layfield LJ, Bentz JS, Gopez EV. Immediate on-site interpretation of fineneedle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis Cancer 2001;93:319-322.

67. Savoy AD, Raimondo M, Woodward ТА et al. Can endosonographers evaluate on-site cytologic adequacy? A comparison with cytotechnologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2007- 65' 953-957.

68. Hikichi T, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists. J Gastroenterol 2009' 44: 322-328.

69. LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 475-481.

70. Turner B.G, Cizginer S, Agarwal D et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:91-98.

71. Hoda K.M, Rodriguez S.A, Faigel D.O. EUS-guided sampling of suspected Gl stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1218- 1223.

72. Mekky MA, Yamao K, Sawaki A et al. Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 913-919.

73. Nguyen P, Feng J.C, Chang K.J. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUSguided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of liver lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 357-361.

74. Singh P, Mukhopadhyay P, Bhatt В et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus CT scan for detection of the metastases to the liver: results of a prospective comparative study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 367-373.

75. Yoshida S, Yamashita K, Yokozawa M et al. Diagnostic findings of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: proposal of a combined cytology with newly defined features and histology diagnosis. Pathol Int 2009; 59: 712-719.

76. Papanikolaou IS, Adler A, Wegener К et al. Prospective pilot evaluation of a new needle prototype for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration: comparison of cytology and histology yield. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 342-348.

77. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz E, Lozano-Leon A et al. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses.World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 289-293.

78. Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar S et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 919-924.

79. VossM, Hammel P, Molas G et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut 2000; 46: 244-249.

80. Ardengh J.C, Paulo G.A, Nakao F.S et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration core biopsy: comparison between an automatic biopsy device and two conventional needle systems. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2008; 38: 105-115.

81. Turhan N, Aydog G, Ozin Y et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: A prospective study of 50 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:808-817.

82. Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Y et al. The diagnosis of Gl stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 37-43.

83. Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Matsui N et al. Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 2077-2082.

84. Aithal GP, Anagnostopoulos GK, Tam W et al. EUS-guided tissue sampling: comparison of «dual sampling" (Trucut biopsy plus FNA) with «sequential sampling" (Trucut biopsy and then FNA as required). Endoscopy 2007;39: 725-730.

85. Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN et al. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 185-190.

86. Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Guldhammer Skov В et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 117-125.

87. Storch I, Shah M, Thurer R et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: when tissue is the issue. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 86-90.

88. Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R et al. Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:505-511.

89. Fernandez-Esparrach G, Sendino O, Sol Met al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy 2010;42: 292-299.

90. Gerke H, Rizk MK, Vanderheyden AD et al. Randomized study comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy and fine needle aspiration with high suction. Cytopathology 2010; 21: 44-51.

91. Gines A, Wiersema M J, Clain JE et al. Prospective study of a Trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 597-601.

92. Thomas T, Kaye PV, Ragunath К et al. Endoscopic-ultrasound-guided mural trucut biopsy in the investigation of unexplained thickening of esophagogastric wall. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 335-339.

93. Thomas T, KayePV, Ragunath К etal. Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 584-591.

94. Kipp BR, Pereira TC, Souza PC et al.Comparison of EUS-guided FNA and Trucut biopsy for diagnosing and staging abdominal and mediastinal neoplasms. Diagnostic cytopathology 2009; 37: 549556.

95. Shah SM, Ribeiro A, Levi J et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with and without trucut biopsy of pancreatic masses. JOP 2008; 9: 422-430.

96. Dewitt J, McGreevy K, Leblanc J et al. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy of suspected nonfocal chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 76-84.

97. Gleeson FC, Clayton AC, Zhang L et al. Adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound core needle biopsy specimen of nonmalignant hepatic parenchymal disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 14371440.

98. Mizuno N, Bhatia V, Hosoda W et al. Histological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using EUS-guided trucut biopsy: a comparison study with EUS-FNA. J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 742-750.

99. Song HJ, Park YS, Seo DWet al. Diagnosis of mediastinal tuberculosis by using EUS-guided needle sampling in a geographic region with an intermediate tuberculosis burden. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71: 1307-1313.

100. EloubeidiMA, Mehra М, BeanSM. EUS-guided 19-gauge trucut needle biopsy for diagnosis of lymphoma missed by EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 937-939.

101. Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley J-W, Larghi A et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1189-1196.

102. Behling C. A cytology primer for endosonographers. In: Hawes RH, Fockens P eds. Endosonography. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006: 273-291.

103. de Luna R, Eloubeidi MA, Sheffield MV et al.Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations in pancreatic fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30: 71-76.

104. Wallace WA, Monaghan HM, Salter DM et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and liquid-based thin-layer cytology. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60: 388-391.

105. Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P et al. Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:167-177.

106. Fabre M, Ben-Lagha N, Palazzo L. La cytologie en milieu liquide peutelle remplacer la cytologie conventionnelle pour le diagnostic des ponctions a I'aiguille fine sous echoendoscopie? Resultats d’une tude prospective multicentrique [abstract]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2003; 27: A66.

107. Meara RS, Jhala D, Eloubeidi MA et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided FNA biopsy of bile duct and gallbladder: analysis of 53 cases. Cytopathology 2006; 17: 42-49.

108. Rossi ED, Larghi A, Verna EC et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided fineneedle aspiration with liquid-based cytologic preparation in the diagnosis of primary pancreatic lymphoma. Pancreas 2010; 39: 1299-1302.

109. Berzosa M, Tsukayama DT, Davies SF et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2010; 14: 578-584.

110. Michael H, Ho S, Pollack В et al. Diagnosis of intra-abdominal and mediastinal sarcoidosis with EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67: 28-34.

111. Khashab M, Mokadem M, Dewitt J et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration with or without flow cytometry for the diagnosis of primary pancreatic lymphoma - a case series. Endoscopy 2010;42: 228-231.

112. Ribeiro A, Pereira D, Escalon MPetal. EUS-guided biopsyforthe diagnosis and classification of lymphoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:851-855.

113. Mortensen MB, Fristrup C, Holm FS et al. Prospective evaluation of patient tolerability, satisfaction with patient information, and complications in endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 146-153.

114. Al-Haddad M,Wallace MB,Woodward ТА etal. The safety of fineneedle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 204-208.

115. Bournet B, Migueres I, DelacroixMet al. Early morbidity of endoscopic ultrasound: 13 years’ experience at a referral center. Endoscopy 2006;38: 349-354.

116. BentzJS, Kochman ML, Faigel DO etal. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided real-time fine-needle aspiration: clinicopathologic features of 60 patients. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 18: 98-109.

117. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S et al. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2006’ 63622-629.

118. Eloubeidi MA, Gress FG, Savides TJ et al. Acute pancreatitis after EUSguided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a pooled analysis from EUS centers in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 385-389.

119. O'Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotijarena R et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53: 470-474.

120. PolkowskiM, GerkeW, Jarosz D et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2009; 41:329334.

121. Janssen J, К nig K, Knop-Hammad V et al. Frequency of bacteremia after linear EUS of the upper Gl tract with and without FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 339-344.

122. Barawi M, Gottlieb K, Cunha В et al. A prospective evaluation of the incidence of bacteremia associated with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 189-192.

123. Levy MJ, Norton ID, Clain JE et al. Prospective study of bacteremia and complications with EUS FNA of rectal and perirectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 684-689.

124. Levy MJ, Norton ID, Wiersema MJ et al. Prospective risk assessment of bacteremia and other infectious complications in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:672-678. "

125. Banerjee S, Shen B, Baron TH et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for Gl endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 791-798.

126. Allison MC, Sandoe JAT, Tighe R et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut 2009; 58: 869-880.

127. Lee LS, Saltzman JR, Bounds BC et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005: 3:231-236.

128. Aerts JGJV, Kloover J, Los J et al. EUS-FNA of enlarged necrotic lymph nodes may cause infectious mediastinitis. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3: 1191-1193.

129. Annema J.T, Veselic M, Versteegh Ml et al. Mediastinitis caused by EUSFNA of a bronchogenic cyst. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 791-793.

130. Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology - An overview. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 743-759.

131. Erickson RA. EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 267-279.

132. Fazel A, Moezardalan K, Varadarajulu S et al. The utility and the safety of EUS-guided FNA in the evaluation of duplication cysts Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 575-580.

133. Affi A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Norton ID et al. Acute extraluminal hemorrhage associated with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: frequency and clinical significance. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53 221-225.

134. Kien-Fong VuC, Chang F, Doig L et al. A prospective control study of the safety and cellular yield of EUS-guided FNA or Trucut biopsy in patients taking aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or prophylactic low molecular weight heparin. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 808-813.

135. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA. Frequency and significance of acute intracystic hemorrhage during EUS-FNA of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 631-635.

136. Brugge W.R, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1330-1336.

137. Chee Y, Crawford J, Watson H et al. Guidelines on the assessment of bleeding risk prior to surgery or invasive procedures. Br J Haematol 2008; 140: 496-504.

138. Zuckerman MJ, Hirota WK, Adler DG et al. ASGE guideline: the management of low-molecular-weight heparin and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2005:61: 189-194.

139. Anderson M.A, Ben-Menachem T, Gan SI et al. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1060-1070.

140. Bousti re C, Veitch A, Vanbiervliet G et al. Endoscopy and antiplatelet agents. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 445-461.

141. Gress F, Michael H, Gelrud D et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: evaluation of pancreatitis as a complication. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 864-867

142. Di Matteo F, Shimpi L, Gabbrielli A et al. Same-day endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration: do we need to be cautious? Endoscopy 2006; 38: 1149-1151.

143. Hirooka Y, Goto H, Itoh A et al. Case of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor in which endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy caused dissemination. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;18: 1323-1324.

144. Paquin SC, Gariepy G, Lepanto L et al. A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 610-611.

145. Eloubeidi M.A, Tamhane A, Lopes TL et al. Cervical esophageal perforations at the time of endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective evaluation of frequency, outcomes, and patient management. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 53-56.

146. Doi S, Yasuda I, Iwashita T et al. Needle tract implantation on the esophagealwall after EUS-guided FNA ofmetastaticmediastinal lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 988-990.

147. Shah J.N, Fraker D, Guerry D et al. Melanoma seeding of an EUS-guided fine needle track. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 923-924.

148. Micames C, Jowell P.S, White R et al. Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUSguided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58: 690-695.